Number of cables in enclosed pathways meeting maximum fill ratio criteria
Enter cable diameter and pathway (conduit) internal diameter. Results use standard industry fill factors: 53% (one cable), 31% (two cables), 40% (three+ cables).
Note: Results assume circular pathway and identical round cables. Actual install capacity can vary with pulling geometry, bends, and spacers.
Solid Conductor Gauge
Enclosed Cable Pathway Fill — Explanation
An enclosed cable pathway is a cable pathway whose contents are accessed at the ends or by removing a cover/lid, fully surrounding the cables.
Types of enclosed pathways
- Without longitudinal access (“end-access”; e.g., conduit).
- With longitudinal access (“length-access”; with hinged or removable lid/cover).
Fill ratio definition
The pathway fill ratio \(F\) expresses how much of the pathway’s cross-section is occupied by cables (ignores interstitial gaps and bends):
\[ F \;=\; \frac{\text{Integrated cross-sectional area of all cables}}{\text{Cross-sectional area of pathway internal space}} \]
Symbols:
- \(F\) = pathway fill ratio
- \(D_c\) = cable diameter; \(N\) = number of identical cables
- \(A_c = \tfrac{\pi D_c^{2}}{4}\) = area of one round cable
- \(A_p\) = cross-sectional area of pathway internal space
Pathway cross-section
- Circular: \(\displaystyle A_p = \frac{\pi D_p^{2}}{4}\) where \(D_p\) is the internal diameter.
- Rectangular: \(\displaystyle A_p = H \times W\) where \(H\) and \(W\) are internal height and width.
Simplified (identical round cables in circular pathway)
\[ F \;=\; N \left( \frac{D_c}{D_p} \right)^{2} \]
Industry standard fill factors
- 1 cable: \(53\%\)
- 2 cables: \(31\%\)
- 3+ cables: \(40\%\)
Reverse calculation — maximum number of cables
- Circular pathway: \[ N \;=\; F \,\frac{D_p^{2}}{D_c^{2}} \]
- Rectangular pathway: \[ N \;=\; F \,\frac{H\,W}{\frac{\pi D_c^{2}}{4}} \;=\; \frac{4FHW}{\pi D_c^{2}} \]
Rounding guidance
- For small counts (≤3), rounding up can be unrealistic (e.g., summed cable diameters exceeding \(D_p\)).
- Always verify rounded values against the target fill factor.
- Higher counts better correlate with the target \(F\); rounding down is the conservative choice.
These formulas assume straight runs, identical round cables, and circular or rectangular pathways.